Posts Tagged ‘Professionalism’

As promised in yesterday’s post about “The Worst Mistakes I’ve Made As An Employee,” I’d like to share with you a few of the key things I think I’ve done well through the years where I’ve worked.  These are the decisions or patterns of behavior that I hope have characterized my time as an employee, from the time I got my first job as a 16-year-old small town grocery store clerk making $1.60 an hour to my current role as an online community manager for a Fortune 100 company.  I can’t help but think that people who exhibit these behaviors will have good success and satisfaction in their careers as well.

Here goes…

Take on more responsibility than is required.  I take no pleasure in doing only what is expected of me in a role.  I want to do my best at my work, and that includes acting on the thoughts that come to mind about how to improve processes, get more accomplished, better organize work, and voluntarily tackle things that nobody else seems to have on their radar.  Willingly taking on more responsibility than expected helps the business, creates new opportunities, solves problems, expands one’s capabilities, and usually paves a path to officially expanded roles and career advancement.

For example, in the early 1990s I was the associate dean of a small business college, having been promoted to that role from instructor.  One of the perennial issues at that college was the operation of the bookstore.  It was inefficiently operated, disorganized, and a frustrating experience for students as well as a financial drain for the college.  After considering the work I thought it would take to turn it around, I made an offer to the college dean that if he would give me responsibility for operating the bookstore in addition to my current duties, remove the current manager from her position and add half her salary to mine, I would turn it around.  He did just that, and I kept my end of the bargain, making it an organized and smoothly operated bookstore that next semester and thereafter.

Similarly, I can’t tell you the number of times that I have inherited (willingly or otherwise) the responsibilities of others when people on my teams have left the company or moved to other departments, leaving fewer of us to do more with less.  By accepting and even seeking out greater responsibility with a positive attitude, people learn that I am serious about getting things done.  Supervisors learn that they can give me a job to do, leave me alone, and it will get done.  If I need their help, I will ask for it.  Otherwise, they can assume all is well.  I will squeal if and when I reach my reasonable limit, but until then, they can rightly know that I’m on top of my duties.

Put in more time than is required.  While the previous suggestion centers around taking on more responsibility, this one is about putting in extra time.  I don’t remember how many years it has been since I’ve averaged only 40 hours per week.  I tend to average in the low 50s instead of the 40s.  Occasionally, I go well beyond that, but I don’t recommend doing so except for rare occasions when there simply is no other alternative, and only then for a very short period of time.  It isn’t nice when employers expect extra hours every week from salaried employees, but it is good to be in a situation where you love what you do and willingly give it more time in order to do the best job possible in a reasonable, sustainable amount of time.  Not everyone is in a life situation that allows them to give extra hours with no corresponding increase in compensation, but for someone like me whose sons are long gone from home, I have that luxury and am glad to do so.

Ask for what you want.  You may not get all you want, but you certainly won’t get what you wish for if you don’t ask for it.  There have been two times in the past four years alone when roles were created for me on other teams that would not have been created without me initiating the conversations.  In 2009 I called the manager of a different team out of the blue and pitched an idea about the possibility of a new role being created on his team with me filling it.  It took a few months to go through all the internal hoops for it to happen, but since the manager liked the idea, he worked with others as needed over several months to make it come to pass.  Something similar happened in 2011 when I thought it was necessary for our internal social network to be owned by a different business area, and for me to go along with it to that area to manage it.  Again, after a few months and several discussions with key stakeholders working together, it came to fruition.  Dream Big.  Show the potential benefits of your ideas, and go for them.

Be kind to others.  This seems rather basic, but you’d be surprised how often people don’t follow this simple principle.  Being rude, self-centered, sharp-tongued, avoiding others, being unresponsive to requests, not returning calls or emails, and generally being a pain in the behind to others just makes you the kind of person coworkers have no desire to be around.  Why would anyone want to be that person?  Most of us spend more waking hours with our work colleagues than with those who live under own own roof at home.  Why wouldn’t you want to have the best relationships possible since you’re going to be spending a huge amount of time together weekly?  I want to be thought of as someone who generously gives to others, is OK with occasional interruptions in order to help people out, speaks kindly, encourages others, and who does a reasonably good job of living the Golden Rule, treating others the way I want them to treat me.  We teach it to our kids.  Why should we be any different as adults?

Trust others.  I tend to trust others until they give me a reason not to trust.  This approach seems to be better for relationships, easier on the mind and emotions, and benefits everyone involved since trust is usually rewarded with trust returned in your direction.  I understand that there are certain roles in businesses which lend themselves to being very cautious, skeptical and perhaps lacking in trust.  People in such roles need to do what their positions require without coming off as always distrustful of others.  I know I am a person of integrity, so when someone questions that integrity in any way, it is highly offensive.  Likewise, I don’t want to appear to question someone else’s integrity unjustifiably.  Of course, if you ever give me a reason not to trust you, I will continue to cooperate and work with you as needed, but I will be extremely cautious and you will have to earn that trust back over a long period of time which is outside of your control.

Help others reach their goals.  This involves being an encourager to people, taking time to genuinely listen to them, and then taking action to the extent that it is within your ability to assist.  Even though I am not currently in a management role, it is very possible for me to help others achieve their goals by providing assistance within the scope of my responsibilities and authority.  You do not have to have positional authority to have an effective impact on the organization and individuals within it.  Individuals can have significant influence without having a single person formally reporting to them.  For those who are in supervisory positions, I consider this one of their primary responsibilities–one characterized by developing others, being a cheerleader, inspiring, encouraging, empowering, guiding, leading, and genuinely celebrating others’ success as they accomplish challenging business objectives and personal career goals.

Looking at the above patterns of behavior that I believe characterize the bulk of my work history, I would summarize them in two simple thoughts: (1) strive to do your very best, and (2) focus on others as much (or more) than you focus on yourself.

So there you have it–my worst mistakes discussed in a previous post, and several positive and helpful patterns of behavior that have contributed significantly to success and satisfaction in my work.  I’d love to hear your thoughts about work experiences and patterns that have shaped your career.

I believe in the value of sharing mistakes I’ve made in the hope that others may benefit from my experience and avoid making those same mistakes.  To that end, I thought it might be good to reflect on poor choices I’ve made in various roles across multiple companies and post about them here.  The list below isn’t an exhaustive list of everything I can imagine others might do that is detrimental to their career or work relationships.  It is merely a description of some things I wish I had not done along the way.

Failing to speak up.  I despise conflict, so I too often avoid the hard conversations that may be confrontational.  I want to get along with people.  I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings.  I want to keep the peace and just do my best work in a calm environment without any drama.  As one who has always tested on the introvert side of personality inventories and who is never going to be the life of the party, being quiet comes more naturally than speaking up, but that isn’t always helpful.

The down side of this otherwise admirable quality is that issues which need to be addressed may not be dealt with in a timely manner.  Problems persist and the potential negative consequences include less than optimal team performance and dynamics, poorer business decisions due to lack of input, not to mention the inner turmoil that comes from remaining silent when something is bugging me.  It took me a while to realize that the actual negative consequences of failing to speak up are worse than the imagined consequences of speaking up.  That is, the difficulty of hard conversations is rarely (if ever) as bad as you imagine it might be, especially if you approach such conversations with genuineness and kindness.

Seeing some coworkers as enemies.  It’s no secret that in an organization of any size there will be some strained relationships.  Different personalities, values and agendas practically guarantee that people will occasionally be at odds with one another.  What must not happen, though, is reaching a point where you always think negatively of certain coworkers and, consequently, treat them in a manner that perpetuates the negative relationship.  I may not like the way some people act.  I may believe rightly that they would throw me under the bus in a heartbeat if they had the chance and if they thought it would somehow make them look good or help them climb the ladder or advance their personal agenda.  But I am first and foremost an employee of my company who is hired to help the business accomplish its objectives, and that sometimes means working cooperatively with others in order to advance the cause of the business, even when every fiber of my being would just like to tell the other person where to go.  Be the bigger person and focus on the business goals and objectives, not the interpersonal difficulties.

Leaving too soon.  I’m coming up on my tenth anniversary this year at my company, so this isn’t a current issue with me, but if I take a close look at my resume going back 30+ years of full-time work, I can see some times where I took the easy way out to go to a different company or organization rather than stay and overcome a difficult situation.  Maybe those were the right decisions, maybe not.  I’m sure I had no problem justifying them at the time, and once I had mentally checked out of the roles, it was just a matter of time before I officially left.  However, when I look over someone’s resume today when looking to fill a role and I see a lot of short-term gigs of two years or less, it raises a huge red flag and makes me wonder what kind of staying power the person has.  I want to be someone who loves what he does (as I do) and who cares enough to change a “flight” instinct to one of confronting issues and overcoming them.  I suppose this mistake is related to the first one above in that it can be a way to avoid conflict.

Responding in anger.  It is never a good idea to fire off an email when you’re angry.  It is rarely the wise choice to spout off with what you want to come back with in a heated meeting, phone call, or face-to-face encounter.  In situations where you have the opportunity to hit the pause button before responding, do so.  I recently had this happen when I received some unwelcome news via email at work that made me a very unhappy camper.  My every instinct was to fire off a sharp reply to some people much higher in the org chart than I am or ever expect to be.  Fortunately, I just vented my frustration with my understanding teammates sitting nearby and announced that I was taking a walk.  On that walk I stopped by the desks of some people I hadn’t seen in a while to catch up with them and to have some friendly conversation which put me in a very different mood.  By the time I was back at my desk, I was able to respond to the email in a rational, professional manner.

Another practice I have used countless times to avoid responding in anger and to avoid rash decisions of many types is to sleep on a matter overnight.  It is amazing how different some things appear in the light of day compared to how they looked at the end of a long day or evening when you were tired and not at your best.  It may seem silly, but a general rule of thumb I have lived by for decades is that I don’t make major, life-changing decisions when it’s dark outside (whether anger is involved or not).  The world won’t end and most substantive opportunities won’t pass you by if you sleep on some decisions overnight.

So there you have four big mistakes I know I’ve made more than once in my career and with which I still occasionally struggle.  Surely people I have worked with could easily think of additional mistakes I’ve made.

If you’re willing, I’d love to hear in your comments about some of the lessons you’ve learned the hard way in your career.

Coming soon in a post will be the flip side of this topic – some of the things I’ve done in various roles that proved to be good choices and very helpful for my employers and for me.  I wouldn’t want to leave you with the impression that I’m rotten to the core.

Til then…

I had the unpleasant realization Saturday that I was already a day late in completing a quiz for a training class I’m halfway through.  Knowing there was no way I could get to it over my busy weekend, I asked for and received permission to complete it today.  That threw off the plans I had for my day off today which was to prepare and rehearse a presentation I’m giving tomorrow.  So much for casual weekends and lazy days off.

So my first order of business today was to review all the previous training sessions that were to be covered on the quiz, and then complete it.  With no thanks to excessive IT security restrictions on my work laptop, I finally (after three hours) had the material I needed to study.  Then I reviewed it and completed the quiz about 7:15 p.m.  Since I had attended all the sessions relevant to the quiz, paying attention and participating, I likely could have completed the quiz successfully without spending as much time prepping as I did.  However, I like to know beyond all doubt that I’m prepared for something.  I was.

After writing this post, I’ll turn to my planned task for the day of prepping and rehearsing a presentation I’m giving tomorrow night.  I’ve presented on the subject before, so it isn’t new material, but it will be organized in a different manner than I’ve presented before.  I always like to rehearse numerous times out loud before a public speaking engagement, so my evening and much of tomorrow will be given to doing so.  I want to know when I stand before those present tomorrow night that I am giving them my best.

When I think back to my January 4 post about my three words, the second word was “stretch” which means I want to do more than what is required of me.  That isn’t just to please others, but to live up to my own expectations and potential.  It can make for long days and hours doing things that I could probably get by with on less effort.  But I would know the difference even if others might not.

Leap year lesson #282 is It’s better to over-prepare.

I wrote here a couple of months ago about the difficulty of walking tightropes.  I’ve faced another similar challenging situation in recent weeks.  It’s finding the right balance of doing my best in a professional, unbiased way as the community manager of a 20,000 member social network vs. knowing when to take part in discussions that can be very controversial in nature.

My first duty at work is to do what they hired me to do, so over the past more than two years I have avoided being involved in religious or political discussions that happen on that social network.  I don’t want to do anything that might alienate half of the community I am charged with leading.

The difficulty for me, though, is when I have strong convictions about something from a religious standpoint.  On the one hand, I want to take the impartial side of moderator and limit my involvement to making sure everyone follows the guidelines and respects the views of others.  On the other hand, there are times when I feel like I can and perhaps should make substantive contributions to conversations out of my personal convictions, and that failure to do so is somehow hypocritical or cowardly.

It doesn’t help that my conservative Christian beliefs are not politically correct on all matters discussed and would be easy grounds for some to attack and to even use against me in jeopardizing my job if they wished.  So my failure to speak up then makes me wonder if I’m being unfaithful in my beliefs out of fear for my job.  That isn’t a good place to be.

I suspect that I will continue to take the corporate high road and do my best as moderator to manage the community peaceably since that is what I’m paid to do.  But it is unfortunate that there is a present reality where those on the conservative right feel like they can’t speak their heart on some matters without fear of reprisal in what appears to be an increasingly hostile environment against such views.

Leap year lesson #226 is one I struggle with daily – Know when to speak and when to be silent.

My last post was about using your talents and, for me, getting back in the saddle again.  I talked about starting a new class at my church on August 5 after taking a few years off from teaching.

Today the room was prepared.  New supplies were purchased.  Much cleaning was done.  Preparation for the lesson was complete.  Food and drinks were on hand.  The target group had known about the start for more than a month and was reminded last week to be in the new class today.  I was as ready as I could be.

The only problem?  Nobody came.  Nobody, that is, except the good man who has agreed to help me with the class.

Yes, it was disappointing, especially when a couple of people told me afterward that they saw the guys that should have been there hanging around outside the building during the class time.  At least we know where to go look for them next time.

The good news is that we can only go up from here!  Plus my lesson for next week is already prepared.

I knew starting something for this particular target group wouldn’t be easy, and that’s fine.  I don’t have to have easy, but I do have to have participants.

We’ll keep moving forward with the plan.  I still believe we’re doing the right thing.  I may reach out to a few others who are not involved or who are only minimally involved during that time slot elsewhere to join the cause.

The takeaway for me today is to continue to plan, study, prepare and do what I can to make it a good experience for any who choose to come, whether that is one or a hundred.  When it comes to efforts like this, sometimes success can’t be measured by how many participate, but by how faithful you are in making the effort.

Leap year lesson #214 is Do your best regardless of how many will know.

The dominant news story of the day today has been the mass shooting in the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado – a tragic, senseless act of some deranged man whose motives and psyche we may never understand.  My heart goes out to all those directly and indirectly impacted by the tragedy.  My prayers are with the families of the victims and those recovering from injuries.  I trust justice will be done and the shooter will never again know what it is to be a free man in society.

The side story for me in all this has been the grossly irresponsible reporting by so-called professionals who seem more interested in being the first to speculate about the incident rather than being correct in what is reported.  ABC News’ Brian Ross should be out of a job tonight in my opinion for his erroneous speculation with zero fact-checking this morning.  That is unconscionable behavior for anyone is his public, national role.

There is a side to most (if not all) of us that seems all too ready to jump to conclusions we would like to be true.  We really don’t want little things like facts getting in the way of us touting what we want to believe is true.  Facts are inconvenient when they don’t support our presuppositions or desired conclusions.

Most of us have had times where we’ve had a very lumpy humble pie for dessert after jumping to some conclusion before all the evidence is in.  It doesn’t set well when we eat humble pie.  Hopefully, however, it makes us less eager to feast on the same buffet of irresponsibility the next time an opportunity arises.

Actions have consequences, and while we have control over our actions, we have no control over the consequences of those actions.  Irresponsible behavior, be it personal or professional, bears consequences – sometimes very serious ones.

Whether in your own home, at your work, with your neighbors, friends or strangers, please try to remember leap year lesson #200 – Don’t jump to conclusions.

A friend and coworker had a major good moment today at work.  I knew he was up to the task and I had total confidence in what he would do.  It was a joy to hear him talk about it afterward and to see how good he felt about it.

I enjoy being at that point in my career when I’m not consumed by ambition or wanting things for myself, or where I am threatened in any way by the success of others.  I take great pleasure in seeing my colleagues do well and advance in their careers.  I want to support them in those efforts and cheer them on.  There are too many self-serving folks around ready to throw others under a bus.  We need more people to encourage others, support them and celebrate with them when good things happen.

So congrats, my friend (you know who you are, CS).  It is a pleasure to have you as a friend and colleague.  You deserve it.  Well done!

Leap year lesson #199 is It’s nice to celebrate the success of others.

I’ve had several occasions in recent months where I have appreciated the professional courtesy and practice of researchers, authors and journalists who have interviewed me on the subject of enterprise social networks.  The simple but vital thing they have done following an interview is to send me in advance what they intend to publish, allowing me the opportunity to verify or edit the content before publication.  The practice has kept them from making several mistakes that would otherwise have happened if they went straight from interview to publication.

As a blogger, the practice is important to me because we independent, unpaid bloggers have enough of a hard time being accepted by so-called “professional” journalists as it is; the last thing we need to do is to give them examples of practices that fail to live up to professional journalistic standards.  Verifying quotes, ideas and meaning with those referenced is critical as we strive to do our best and be taken seriously.

A related practice that we suffer the consequences of daily – especially in this political season – is one claim after another by political candidates or one accusation after another of what the other candidate did or said at some point.  Almost never is the full context of the quote or circumstance given.  It takes someone doing an all-too-rare fact check on the statements to bring the real truth to light.  By then the speech or the commercial has had its impact and the candidate is on to other statements yet to be fact checked.

Integrity demands that these processes be flipped around.  Just as it is unwise and unfair for me as a blogger to quote someone without allowing the person to chance to verify it before publication, so it serves no good purpose to allow candidates (or coworkers or those in other organizations to which we belong) to make unverified claims and to allow them to go unchallenged.

Checking facts takes time.  It isn’t exciting work.  But we must do more of it in the name of integrity and with the desire to speak only the truth, avoiding misunderstandings.

Leap year lesson #195 is Check your facts and verify your sources.

I have great respect for people who are themselves wherever they are.  It irks me when I see someone behave one way in front of some people and an entirely different way in front of others.  The only chameleons I enjoy are reptilian, not human.

This is not to say that we are to be so narrow in our social skills that we cannot relate to a variety of people in different ways and social situations.  I am being myself when I choose to bring my best social graces to a formal occasion such as a wedding, and I am being myself when I kick back with friends or family or my dog informally.  Doing as the Romans do while in Rome is not always a sign of betraying one’s core values.  Of course, sometimes it’s just fun to be contrarian and go against the norm as I did earlier this week when I chose to go to my company president’s office dressed in a bee costume rather than the normal, proper tie.  (Don’t worry.  It was in my role as the community manager for our internal social network called Buzz, so it was still somewhat appropriate.)

Observing people in business settings is where I usually see the negative kinds of behaviors I have in mind here.  For example, when someone acts and speaks publicly in support of an idea when the idea’s main proponent (usually a superior) is present, but then speaks against the idea and perhaps the very person they were kissing up to when absent from the leader.  Not only is it hypocrisy, but it’s completely unhelpful in the process of freely discussing ideas and working to arrive at the best plans and solutions.

Outside of work, I share the same preference and trust for those consistent in living out what they claim to believe than those who say one thing and do another.  I would prefer the honesty of one whose life experiences and values seem polar opposites to mine over the untrustworthiness of someone inconsistent in their words and actions.

The bottom line for me… know who you are and consistently live out leap year lesson #190 – Be yourself wherever you are.

I had to take a quiz today to wrap up a series of training sessions on community management.  It was fairly easy and painless, but still not without some stress.  The quiz covered the content of the last five course sessions, so I spent time reviewing the content of those sessions prior to the quiz.

The good thing about a quiz is that it holds you accountable for what you should know at some point in the educational process.  If all you have to do is show up, get marked as present, but never be held accountable, the system is flawed.

I wish there were more accountability procedures in the workplace.  I’ve had several people ask me to be an accountability buddy through the years and I’m always glad to oblige.  Such informal, peer relationships can be very effective.  Of course, there are also the formal annual reviews as well between employee and manager ingrained into many workplaces.

Sadly, I don’t have to look too far to find folks who don’t appear to be held accountable for actually getting something meaningful accomplished.  When that happens, it is bad for business as well as a disincentive to others who wonder why they have to work hard while others do not.

Fortunately, my work ethic isn’t negatively impacted by such people – I’ll give it my all in whatever I do because I am intrinsically motivated to do so.  But not everyone shares that sentiment.

In my ideal business world, employees would have regular check-ups with their supervisors to answer the questions of what they’ve accomplished since the last check-up, what they plan to accomplish before the next one, and what obstacles they may need leader assistance in overcoming.  For me, the every-other-week schedule my manager and I have for such discussions works, but each employee and supervisor should set the frequency to suit themselves, making sure the check-ups are frequent enough to head off any concerns early rather than later in the process.

Like passing the quiz I took today, having accountability discussions makes sure we’re on track with what we should know and do.

Leap year lesson #174 is It’s good to be held accountable.