Posts Tagged ‘Risk’

Martin LutherIf you’re looking for a book review of something hot off the press, you’re in the wrong place with this post.  Today I completed the brief treatise by Martin Luther written in 1520 called Concerning Christian Liberty, also called On the Freedom of a Christian.  I downloaded the free Kindle version a while back not knowing how long it was and was quite surprised to find that it is only a few dozen pages long.  In this final of three treatises by Luther in 1520, he writes about the Christian’s freedom from the law (i.e., Christian liberty) once justified by faith, and that the Christian should have a desire to serve and do good works from the motivation of love and service to one’s neighbor rather than as a means to earn favor with God.

I’m not of a mind to critique the contents of this or any book by Martin Luther.  I am deeply indebted to him as a Protestant.  I am aware of the criticisms that some have against a few of his views and actions, especially from his later years, but those do not negatively reflect on his core writings which were of great significance in the Protestant Reformation of the 1500s.  For the very valuable truths contained in the writing, I suggest you take the short amount of time it takes to read it yourself.

Instead, I want to share here some reactions to reading a significant document nearly 500 years old.

1. It is refreshing to read people who write what they think and who are not afraid to offend, even if speaking the truth is offensive.

For example, in this treatise, Luther prefaces the main body of work with a letter to Pope Leo X in which he repeatedly speaks well of the pope’s personal character, but in which he clearly condemns the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church:

These things are clearer than the light to all men; and the Church of Rome, formerly the most holy of all Churches, has become the most lawless den of thieves, the most shameless of all brothels, the very kingdom of sin, death, and hell; so that not even antichrist, if he were to come, could devise any addition to its wickedness.

Come on, Marty, tell us what you really think!  It should not come as a surprise that Luther was excommunicated from the Church a few months after sending this to Pope Leo X and only a few weeks after setting fire to the papal bull (edict) from the summer of 1520 in which Leo warned Luther of excommunication unless Luther recanted many of his statements.

This frankness with which writers used to say what they think, even in the sometimes lengthy and pointed titles they gave to their writings, is refreshing.  We could use a little more of that today.  I appreciate the frankness, even if I don’t always agree with the statements of those who exhibit it.

2. There is great value in being reminded of the historical roots of one’s faith.

Too many modern “Christians” think that what they believe is up to them alone, that the ultimate judge and jury of right and wrong is their personal conviction, whatever they decide to define as truth.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  If the Scriptures are authoritative in all matters of faith and practice as Luther reminded his generation, then truth is not subject to the whims of nations or small bodies of believers or any individual’s interpretation, and it certainly isn’t determined by 21st century American political correctness.

To go back to the Scriptures and find truth that is soundly preached by Luther 1500 years later and still soundly preached now (at least by some) 500 years after Luther, provides a consistency that serves to remind modern believers that we are not in this alone.  Others have gone before and, if the world continues, others will come behind to always hold forth a light of truth and hope for the world until such day as its Creator decides to bring it to completion.

3. It takes immense courage to go against powerful authorities.

After years of speaking and writing according to what the Bible taught, and with full knowledge of the implications of his opposition to the papacy, Luther was pointedly asked at the Diet of Worms (a formal deliberative assembly held in the town of Worms, Germany) in 1521 whether the writings laid out before him on a table were his and whether he stood by their contents.  His eventual reply was:

Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures or by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the pope or in councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God.  I cannot and will not recant anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience.  May God help me.  Amen.  (p. 460 of Martin Luther by Martin Brecht, Fortress Press, 1985-93)

Whether those authorities are in the church, government, business or other parts of culture and society, it is no small task to buck the system.  You have to be deeply committed to your cause and willing to suffer the consequences that come with crossing lines vehemently guarded by others.  Not everyone who does so lives to tell about it, yet those who are so compelled couldn’t live with themselves if they failed to try.  Sometimes the paths we walk are lined with the remains and efforts of those who tried that path before us.

4. Worthwhile writings last.

It’s also true that some worthless and harmful writings last, but I’ll file that fact under “Sometimes you have to take the bad with the good.”  That I can go to the Web or the Kindle store and download for free or little cost complete writings centuries old is amazing and one that more of us ought to take advantage of.  A decade ago I would not have dreamed that I would be passing time in a doctor’s office earlier this week reading Martin Luther on a smartphone.  Such writings have lasted because they are significant and we should read them for the same reason.  Given the relative ease with which technology gives us access, we have no barrier stopping us if we are interested.

As I stated above, this isn’t a book review so much as a reflection on a few takeaways from reading the book.  As I continue my goal of reading and blogging about a book every other week throughout 2013, I intend to continue the pattern of alternating between work-related professional books and a variety of other topics of more personal interest.  Next up will be another professional book.

What have you read lately?  What’s on your list to read next?

ElephantintheRoom-Leo_CullumHow many times have you been in a conversation with others and wanted to bring up some obvious topic, but failed to do so?  How many times have you sat in meetings, heard proposals, watched presentations, discussed important matters, or been embarrassed on behalf of someone else, all the while dying to say what is really on your mind, but never mustering the courage to say it?  Why do we hold back and so often fail to acknowledge the elephant in the room?

In the case of meetings at work, perhaps you can’t bring yourself to openly disagree with someone higher up the org chart.  Maybe you are the kind of person who avoids conflict at all cost, both in personal and professional settings.  Maybe you fear the known or unknown consequences of being that person to bring up what you and probably many others wish someone would address.

If you don’t acknowledge obvious issues, it is very possible that the consequences of failing to address them will be worse than doing so.  For example, if you have relationship issues with someone, but try to keep the peace instead of putting matters on the table, aren’t the potential emotional and physical consequences of holding it all inside worse than the temporary awkwardness and unpleasantness of the dreaded conversation?  If you are being pitched a plan of action by a manager or someone higher up than you in an organization, and you know that the suggested path has major flaws, aren’t you complicit in failed and potentially harmful business decisions if you do not raise the concerns you have?  If others are trying to get you to go down some path that could be dangerous or have serious negative consequences personally and/or professionally, don’t you have the responsibility to listen to your intuition and interject a cautionary word into the conversation?  If someone’s dress, hygiene, personal habits or behavior are the subject of much discussion behind his/her back, isn’t the decent thing to do to have that needed and difficult private conversation in order to help the other person?

When it comes to acknowledging elephants in the room, few seem willing to be the one to step up and do so.  Oh, how we need more people willing to take that step!  Doing this doesn’t mean you have to do so in an unkind, harsh, abrasive, offensive way.  Besides, you won’t likely succeed in promoting positive change with that approach, anyway.  Instead, with a genuine heart of compassion, caring, and concern for what is wrong or what might fail, you have an incredible opportunity to change the path of a person, group, or entire company from darkness to light, from failure to success.  Those on the hearing end are usually able to sense genuine concern; they will most likely be able to see the intentions of your heart and hear your message, even if it is one that is difficult for them to hear.

Nobody benefits from having a bunch of “yes” men around.  While I’ll never be in a position of corporate power by virtue of the position held, if I ever was, I would hope to be fortunate enough to surround myself with men and women who always speak the truth, even when it is hard for them to deliver the message and perhaps harder for me to hear.  If it is my thoughts, plans, attitude, behavior or anything else that is ever the elephant in the room, then I desperately need and want someone to tell me that.  Do it gently and kindly and (if possible) privately, but by all means, do it!  I’m a big boy.  I can handle it.

I have no idea what life situations you are in where you feel you need to bring up something “obvious” that nobody else is saying, but I suspect you can think of one or two such situations at this time.  I strongly encourage you, in the interest of doing what is most helpful and kind and beneficial in the long run, acknowledge with whomever else needs to hear that there is an elephant in the room.  The benefit gained from the honest conversation will far outweigh the temporary fear of negative consequences that has held you back so far.

Status QuoThe Latin phrase status quo literally means “the state in which.”  It has been used as a common English term for about 200 years meaning “the existing state of affairs.”

As we near the end of one year and look ahead to a new one contemplating goals and hopes, one thing that seems clear to me is that the status quo is a direct enemy of creativity, innovation, doing new things, and stretching oneself to be more than in the past.  Nobody ever created or innovated or excelled by simply doing the same old things previously done.

In the business world, many companies want to think of themselves as innovative, disruptive, creative and market-leading, yet in what ways do they enforce the status quo to the point of making thinking outside the box – much less acting outside of it – impossible?  How many rules, policies, controls and other innovation-squelching practices are in place that make public claims of innovation or disruption laughable?

At the personal level, the status quo is similarly an enemy of change and making progress toward lifelong dreams.  If all I do next year is what I did this year, then I can’t expect any results to be different or to accomplish anything new.

No matter what organization you are a part of, the principle applies.  The status quo is your enemy if you want to do anything but always keep things exactly as they are right now.  I don’t know about you, but that’s not enough for me or for anyone who wants to make a difference.

Someone has to take a risk.  Someone has to go where others haven’t gone.  Someone has to buck the trends, ignore the norms, and lead to places others didn’t know could exist or were too hesitant to try to reach.  Chances are there is at least one way in which you and I each need to be that person.  We’re not in control of the consequences of trying, and those consequences may turn or well or they may not.  But I’d rather fail at trying something new than succeed at maintaining the status quo.

Leap year lesson #337 is The status quo has to go.

Most of us don’t like being the bearer of bad news.  On the contrary, we would rather be associated with the verse from the prophet Isaiah: “How lovely on the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news” (Isaiah 52:7) – a verse repeated by Paul in Romans 10:15.  The positive image brings to mind a runner going to or perhaps returning to a community to bring welcome news from afar.  Such a messenger will be greeted with joy.

Not so with those who bring bad news.  In ancient times, if a messenger ran to an enemy camp with a message not well received by the hearers, it would be unfortunate but not inconceivable that the hearers might take out their frustration on the messenger.  It was a dangerous role for the one delivering the news.

Nothing much has changed today in that regard.  While we don’t send runners to enemy camps with bad news anymore, we still find ourselves from time to time in the uncomfortable position of telling others things they don’t want to hear.

If you are the messenger, then you have the obligation to deliver the message clearly and with whatever level of compassion seems appropriate.  You don’t really have the option of not delivering the message without failing at an important task.  Friends, managers, coworkers, family members, even strangers may find themselves in such a role and perhaps with a message originating from themselves and not from someone else.

If you are the recipient of the message, then you have to control your emotions and react to the message rather than the messenger.  That isn’t easy.  It’s human nature to lash out at personal criticism or in response to news that is upsetting.  Still, the adult response is to absorb the message, take some time to process it if needed, and then respond appropriately.

Next time you hear something you’d rather not, try to remember leap year lesson #317 – Don’t shoot the messenger: You might miss the message.

Howard Beale in the movie “Network”

We’ve all heard the Edmund Burke quote (or a close variation of it) that “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”  It’s a reminder that we cannot stand on the sidelines and watch evil, immoral actions take place while we remain silent, or else we are complicit in the wrongdoing.  We may not like that thought because it is simpler to console ourselves and justify our inaction than it is to risk getting involved and try to make a difference.

In Christian lingo there are “sins of omission” – much the same idea as the above in that sins are not just bad things we do but also good things we do not do.

The rule applies to many areas of life – government, business, interpersonal relationships, civic and religious organizations, random encounters, etc.  In short, wherever we are, there exists the potential for “good” people to stand by and do nothing while those who hurt, abuse and cause all manner of harm are somehow allowed to continue their actions without others stepping up and stepping in to shout in unison “no more!”  And so the harm continues.  And so those remaining silent on the sidelines stand guilty for failure to stop it.

I realize that each of us is just one voice, but each of us is still one voice and that voice must be heard in opposition to wrong.  Age is no excuse.  Fear is no excuse.  Previous battle scars are no excuse.  Lack of support from others is no excuse.  Being tired is no excuse.  Hesitancy to challenge someone in leadership is no excuse.

What wrongs could be corrected and what failed leadership could be stopped in its tracks if voice after voice finally stood up like Howard Beale in the movie Network and proclaimed “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!”?  If you’ve sulked on the sidelines of failed leadership and the harmful actions of others long enough, then stand up and do something about it.

Leap year lesson #308 is Don’t just sit there – do something.

Three months ago I agreed to teach a new Bible study class on Sundays with the intended audience being men who are in a recovery program.  Some are in between time they have been in jail and when they will be allowed to return home.  After a very slow start of nobody attending the first couple of weeks, we have sputtered along with 0-2 learners present weekly since August.  Their work schedule and the frequency of rotation in and out of the program make it impossible to have a consistent class.  The only regular attendee besides me was the other leader who agreed to help me.  Besides him, three men have each been there once and one man has been several times.

I was willing to give it a try for three months before making a call as to its viability to continue.  Today is the end of that three-month period and today I am disbanding the class.  We were right to try it, although we were woefully wrong in the manner in which we started the class – abandoning every known principle and best practice of how to start new teaching units in the rush to just do it back in the summer.  I won’t make that mistake again.

We’ll merge my tiny class into another excellent class that meets down the hall and that uses the same lesson material.  It’s actually the class I was a member of before starting this one and is a wonderful class filled with men and women who will welcome these men with open arms when they are able to attend.  The discussion will be richer because of the larger number of people and the men will get to meet a wider variety of people in the church than they would huddled together by themselves in my class.

It would have been nice to have a class with throngs of people there weekly, but that wasn’t and won’t be the case given the circumstances.  It’s important to know when to end an experiment and move on.  That time has come.  I’m glad we gave it a shot.

Leap year lesson #299 is Some things are worth trying even if they don’t succeed.

Later this morning a man will come to our house and do some minor touch-up work on the recently renovated master bath.  There are a few places where the caulking has cracked around some edges of the shower, so the company that did the work this summer is sending him to fix it.  It isn’t anything major – just a little annoyance that shouldn’t happen this soon after the work was done, so it needs repair.

A few months ago, there was nothing but open space in the gutted upstairs as everything that was there previously for our two boys’ bedrooms and attic space was removed to make room for a new master suite to be constructed from the ground up.  The work ahead of the renovation company at that point was quite a bit different than the little touch-up that awaits them today.

When I consider the changes that have taken place in the past or need to happen in the future for me personally, they can also be grouped into the larger categories of major renovations that take a lot of time to overhaul versus those that are little touch-up jobs along the way.  Deciding to lose 20 pounds this year took several months of more activity and a change of eating habits that has to continue if I want to keep those pounds off (so far, so good).  Getting a better handle on my retirement financial preparation has taken a lot of study and changes in investments over the past 13 months as I put things in place for retiring in another 10-12 years.  Both of the above changes are significant.  They take more time and effort.  Other minor ones along the way have happened with less planning, less time and minimal effort.

Do you have anything that needs a major overhaul in your life – internal or external?  Have you been dissatisfied with some minor things that could use a touch-up job here and there?  If so, make the decision and do something today to move in the right direction.  The major overhauls aren’t easy, but you sure do enjoy them once they’re complete.

Leap year lesson #264 is Tackle that next major renovation or minor touch-up.

The latter part of this week was a serious crunch time for me.  Having been out of the office most of the previous week for business, and preparing to be on vacation next week, I had to catch up from all that backed up on me last week while getting everything necessary complete in order to safely be away next week.  It wasn’t easy.

By Thursday night, I knew there was no choice but to literally stay up all night working, so that’s what I did.  At 7:15 a.m. Friday I stopped and did my normal morning routine to prep for the day.  After attending a Grandparent’s Day event at our granddaughter’s preschool, I went in to work until I was at a stopping point around 3 p.m.

I’ve pulled a number of all nighters in my day, from college years on.  I know I stay up too late and sleep too little more days than not, but an all nighter?  That is, thankfully, very rare for me at age 55.  Here are some thoughts about the experience:

  • Don’t do it unless there is no other way to get things done that must be done (and make sure you aren’t just imagining that they must be done);
  • It’s possible before the final day of the work week because you know there is an end in sight;
  • It’s a great way to churn out tons of uninterrupted work in a lot fewer hours than it would take at the office with all the interruptions that happen there;
  • It’s probably very bad for your physical health, at least if done regularly;
  • It’s very good for your psychological health if it helps you get caught up with things that otherwise hang over your head and keep you stressed out.

So, while I’m not recommending you go out and try an all nighter, I’m at least admitting that it’s occasionally possible and helpful if that’s what it takes to get me caught up.  It’s a trade-off of risks, so beware.  The body may revolt more than you anticipate.

To generalize the experience, I’ll say that leap year lesson #247 is You can do nearly anything, but it may kill you – so be careful.

While walking my dog tonight, I walked past a house and heard a large tree limb crack over the driveway where the owners’ car was parked.  I looked up in time to see the large limb sink about a foot or two, but not break completely or fall to the ground (or car).  Immediately I went to the front door and surprised the owner who had his wife hold their dog while he peeked out the door like I was the boogeyman.  When I told them what I just saw and heard and that they might want to check it out before it falls and hurts something, they were very grateful.

It was a simple gesture – the neighborly thing to do even though I don’t know them.  It would have been so easy to not warn them and just keep on walking.  Stopping and warning, however, was the kind thing to do.  It’s what I hope someone would do if the same happened as they walked by my house.

The question immediately came to mind about how often we do or do not pause from our planned path to warn others of impending danger.  Whether that danger is a bad business decision, a harmful relationship, a financial decision with little chance to turn out well, choices that threaten your health or career – whatever it may be – it is most likely the right thing to do to pause from our activity long enough to give a gentle warning or express concern.  The intent isn’t to be bossy or control others’ lives, but to care about the welfare of those around us.

If we do that, we should also be open to the possibility that others might warn us from time to time.  That’s probably harder to take than handing out warnings, but just as important.

Are there people around you at work, at home, at school, in your neighborhood or along your daily path that could use a cautionary word?  Is there someone that has been trying to get you to listen to such a word from them?

Leap year lesson #175 is Take time to give and heed warnings.

I do well under pressure.  Not much gets me out of sorts or frazzled.  In the midst of a crisis I’ll be a calming influence and, if possible, interject a little humor along the way to lighten the mood.

In academic study, the ability to do much over a short period of time has served me well.  In work situations, I can churn out a lot into the wee hours of the morning night after night if needed until the work is done.  Granted, I can’t keep at a lightning pace indefinitely, but it is possible when I know there is an end in sight.

This past weekend was an example of a lot of pressure on me over a short period of 48 hours.  It was all good pressure of places to be with other people, prepping for and officiating at a wedding, and prepping and teaching a class for a friend.  Individually, any of them would have made for a pleasant, enjoyable weekend, but together they made for quite a challenge.

I don’t take public speaking lightly.  I’m not about to wing it for a class I teach, much less a wedding I officiate.   So especially for the wedding, I wanted everything said and done to be perfect for the couple’s sake.  When it comes to my part, therefore, I script every word, rehearse it aloud dozens of times, and make constant edits up until the last possible moment to craft each word and be able to speak it as naturally as possible without relying heavily on notes.  I want to look into the couple’s eyes as I speak and reassure them with a smile and a comforting word and voice.

There were moments in preparation for the weekend’s events when I wasn’t quite sure how it was all going to come together, but I have traveled this road too many times to doubt that it would.

And it did.

Depending on the source of the quote, today’s lesson title comes either from Scottish Victorian-era writer Thomas Carlyle or indie film screenwriter Mary Case, but whichever first wrote it, I can attest to it’s truth.

Leap year lesson #171 is No pressure, no diamonds.